AI Platform/Scientific Information Retrieval System

Scientific Information Retrieval System™

Retrieval built for how scientists ask questions

SIRS reads abbreviations, asset codes and drug classes the way your team does, so the evidence it returns matches the question that was asked.

SIRS AT WORKRetrieving
What drives LDL-C elevations in tropifexor-treated NASH patients?
Lexical
Semantic
Bio Graph
Multimodal
RANKED EVIDENCEBio Graph · article count
NR1H4 → CYP7A1
181
NR1H4 → cholesterol
84
NR1H4 → LDL-C
16

How SIRS works

How does SIRS work?

SIRS handles a scientific question in four steps, from interpreting what is being asked to passing only grounded insights to Causaly's agents. Standard retrieval pipelines rely on similarity search alone, while SIRS combines lexical, semantic, knowledge graph and multimodal retrieval and ranks the results before any answer is written, with each step calibrated by biomedical information specialists.

STEP 01

Understand the question

SIRS reformulates ambiguous or abbreviated queries, extracts key biomedical entities and recognizes intent. Curated ontologies then expand the query, so a class such as anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies reaches all 28 drugs in that class.

Causaly / SIRS · Query understanding
Clinical safety profile of anti-CD20 mAbs
ONTOLOGY EXPANSION
rituximabobinutuzumabofatumumabocrelizumab+24 more
STEP 02

Retrieve the evidence

Four retrieval methods run together, so evidence is found whether it matches by exact term, by meaning, by biological relationship, or sits inside a table or figure.

LexicalAsset codes, study IDs, abbreviations
SemanticRelated findings in different wording
Bio GraphDirectional cause-and-effect relationships
MultimodalTables, figures and captions
STEP 03

Fuse and rank

Results from every method are fused into a single list and ranked by factual accuracy and relevance to the biomedical context of the question, so the strongest evidence leads.

Causaly / SIRS · Fused ranking
Table row
Graph edge
Results section
Figure caption
Illustrative ranking
STEP 04

Synthesize a grounded answer

Insights are extracted from each document and kept only when the cited excerpt supports them, which gives the final answer sentence-level citations that link back to the source.

Causaly / Agentic Research · Answer

FXR activation represses CYP7A1 1 and reduces conversion of cholesterol to bile acids 2, a mechanism linked to raised LDL-C in FXR agonist trials 3.

Direct answer3 sources · highlighted at source

Why does retrieval decide answer quality?

Common questions have abundant, easily matched evidence. The questions that shape R&D decisions sit in the long tail, combining mechanisms, populations and sources that rarely appear together, and an agent can only reason over the evidence that retrieval returns.

QUESTION FREQUENCY BY COMPLEXITY
Where SIRS matters most
COMMONTreatments for obesity
SPECIALISTMechanisms of insulin resistance in T2D
LONG TAILAdipokine, mitochondrial and ER-stress cross-talk in T2D insulin resistance
EVIDENCE COVERAGE VS. GENERIC ENTERPRISE SEARCH
CausalyBaseline
Locating a fact in a table
85%
85%
Aggregating evidence across sections
69%
45%
Bridging a drug ontology gap
100%
50%
Composing a multi-step causal chain
93%
20%
Aggregating evidence across documents
68%
12%

Like-for-like benchmark with identical documents and twenty scientific questions (51 expected evidence units), comparing Causaly with an AWS OpenSearch baseline configured to industry best practice.

How does SIRS keep unsupported claims out of the answer?

Every insight is checked against the excerpt it came from before synthesis, and each statement in the final answer links to the highlighted passage in its source, so reviewers can verify it in seconds.

Causaly / SIRS · Grounding check
DirectTropifexor is an FXR agonist that represses CYP7A1.
RelatedReduced bile acid synthesis is associated with raised LDL-C.
DroppedThe effect resolves in all patients after treatment ends.
01

Extract insights

Relevant insights, not raw chunks, are taken from each document.

02

Ground and validate

Each insight is mapped to a cited excerpt, and unsupported ones are removed.

03

Classify the evidence

Direct answer, related evidence or no answer, which keeps limits visible.

04

Synthesize with citations

Supported insights form one answer with sentence-level citations.

Clinical program evaluation

“If it outputs a table, I can pull the exact references behind each point. It’s faster and reduces the risk of missing key perspectives.”
Top 10 pharma companyExternal Innovation Advisor
Read the case study →

What evidence does SIRS search?

SIRS searches the public biomedical record and your own scientific documents with the same pipeline, and new publications become searchable within 24–48 hours.

648M+Scientific relationships in the knowledge graph
40M+PubMed and MEDLINE records
550kClinical trials
1.6MPatent applications and grants
200kbioRxiv and medRxiv preprints
UMLS+Plus Causaly Target and Drug ontologies
PRIVATE DATA

The same retrieval over your internal documents

Investigator brochures, study reports and toxicology reports are parsed down to the section, table, row and figure in a dedicated single-tenant environment.

L3Grounded agentic reasoning
L2Scientific information retrieval
L1Document processing and indexing

Frequently asked questions about SIRS

What is the Scientific Information Retrieval System (SIRS)?

SIRS is the retrieval layer of the Causaly platform. It interprets a scientific question, retrieves evidence from public and internal sources through lexical, semantic, knowledge graph and multimodal retrieval, ranks that evidence, and passes only grounded insights to Causaly’s agents.

How is SIRS different from standard RAG or vector search?

Standard RAG pipelines rely on vector similarity alone and return a short list of loosely related passages. SIRS adds exact-term matching for asset codes and study IDs, ontology expansion for synonyms and drug classes, Bio Graph retrieval for mechanisms, and table and figure retrieval, then ranks the combined results before any answer is written.

How does SIRS reduce hallucinations?

Each insight is mapped to a cited excerpt from its source, and claims without support are dropped before synthesis. Evidence is also classified as a direct answer, related evidence or no answer, so the response states its own limits.

Can SIRS search our internal documents?

Yes. Private Data deployments run SIRS over internal documents such as investigator brochures, clinical study reports and toxicology reports in a dedicated single-tenant environment, retrieving down to the section, table, row and figure with provenance preserved.

How current is the evidence SIRS searches?

New publications are searchable within 24 to 48 hours of publication and are added to the Bio Graph within about four weeks.

Does Causaly train models on customer data?

No. Customer data is not used to train or fine-tune models, and model providers operate under zero-data-retention terms.

Go deeper into how SIRS retrieves and grounds scientific evidence

The whitepaper covers the full retrieval architecture and benchmark method, and Causaly lets you see SIRS-powered answers on your own research questions.